The Continuum Sized Chain in the Lattice of P(N)
Audience:
Tags: set-theoryfoundational-math
Analytics
Comments
Very great video ! I loved the visuals and the explanations are very clear. The only downside I would see (or hear) is the quality of the audio recording, but appart from that, this is insanely good
Very well built video. Some comments (the most important is comment number 3):
-
The topic of cardinalities is well presented on the internet. You noticed it and suggested that the viewer skip it, but you did not divide your video into chapters, so the viewer does not know where to skip. Also, the first two videos that you recommended are great but not really relevant at this point. You can put them in the description or at the end of the video, but here I recommend https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxGsU8oIWjY instead.
-
When you explain the countability of the rational numbers, you sweep under the rug the multiple representation issue and the negative numbers. It is OK to do this, but not acknowledging it is misleading.
-
Your presentation of the reals is confusing. First you divide them into rationals and irrationals without an apparent reason. Then you say that irrationals are infinite decimal numbers. This is a good definition for all reals, but not for irrationals. Then you correct it by requiring them not to have a “pattern,” which is misleading since there are many kinds of patterns. You could have just said that the reals are infinite decimal numbers, and explained how the rationals and irrationals fit into this description.
-
Again you sweep under the rug the issue of double representation and negatives. This is OK, but it should be acknowledged.
I think this is a great first step as an explainer, but I think as a video itself there are general things that could be done to improve it. I feel like going through infinities is fairly generic a topic, so there’s a lot of competition there for one, but I feel like this video doesn’t quite have an identity or target audience in focus to set it apart; ie there’s no particular hook. Going through every number in increasing complexity could work well for some type of lecture, for example, but for this web video case I think there’s a lot more to be done.
That being said, I do like the level of detail and the general quality of the video and animations itself. I think you could do a really, really great job with more and more practice!
Great video! And what a strange construction. I actually came across this is a puzzle on someone’s website once and had no idea how to construct the chain. You made it feel very clear, and had a great introduction to cardinality along the way. I also really liked your visuals.
The video’s start was slow but it really blew my mind at the end. However, the slow start needed as a build-up and for prerequisite knowledge.
This was an interesting topic, and the visuals were fun and engaging. Other resources cover the same result, but you had a good lead-up building the ideas toward the result.
Very nice video! I didn’t know about the continuum chain before this and it really surprised me. The 3D animations were so charming. I think maybe you should consider your target audience a bit more. While I understand wanting to make your video accessible to everyone, I’m not sure if it’s possible to both teach someone basic set theory and make them care about this particular “paradox” all in 25 minutes since it leans on the more advanced side. Things like Cantor’s diagonal argument and Hilbert’s hotel usually serve as the punchline for videos that introduce set theory, and you did a great job explaining them, but I think including all of that in addition to the continuum chain could be overwhelming for a true beginner. But for people that already know the basics, the back half of this video is gold! My only other qualm is the audio quality but you mentioned that. Really well done and I hope you make more!
Just beautiful
The concept is great, a weird mathematical object that can be explained even to smart high schoolers without prerequisites. The animation is fantastic. Top notch stuff. The audio is okay but less great, a better mic and more articulated, less monotone narration would help. I’m not clear who the target audience is exactly, it really starts slow.
I liked the video and its conclusion is indeed surprising. I think you could have limited the scope a bit — even if you start by explaining countability, I doubt a viewer who doesn’t yet know it it can get a sufficiently deep understanding without some pondering by themselves and I found this low-level start rather disengaging. You could have trimmed what you really need for the later sections down into short reminders for the first two chapters. The other two background chapters are so integral that I think their level of detail is just right. Moving on to the infinite chain, I liked the comparison to the difference between the even and natural numbers. That helped clear it up, which is essential with such an abstract object. Overall, I liked how you stepped away from the general manim style — that helps the video to stand out.
Mentioning that infinite may not exist is a great way of starting. Mentioning how infinity is an idealization aligns with my own vision of math. The animations are cute and engaging. It’s quite noble to attempt to explain everything from the beginning. I liked the reflection at the end on non procrastinating. I am looking forward to see more videos from your channel. This reminded me of the following question: Is it possible to find uncountably many infinite sets of natural numbers that any two of these sets have only finitely many common elements? (I believe that the answer was given by Tarski, but i couldn’t find a reference). If I recall correctly this is useful for the construction of the Frechet filter which is needed to prove the existence of non principal ultrafilters (I haven’t worked on this in a while so my memory might be a little shaky). In general, I find it more engaging when videos start with a puzzle that would engage the audience, perhaps coming up with a question like that would improve the video (however, it would be hard to create a puzzle like that if you assume your audience doesn’t know what countable and uncountable means… Designing a good video is such a challenge!)
Mixed feelings, on this one, but for sure it deserves attention and encouragement.
On the “con” part : - too much time at the beginning on well known topics, compared to the time dedicated to the actual topic. I am afraid that many viewers leave the video before the actually new and interesting part - Chapterization would help - monotonous (and low) voice (this is not the only video with this issue in SoMe, I recommend that this should be in the guidelines, so that the authors pay more attention to it)
On the “pro” part : - really interesting and uncommon stuff in the second part, counterintuitive and hence interesting - clearly exposed.
- (I myself discovered the topic, and I am really pleased to have learnt such a thing !)
Definitely the video can be used for students as a teaser for set theory / countability lessons.
This is the first video of the author : he should go on, and the issues I mentioned will progressively be fixed.
I like the attempt of creating intuition for the infinite amount of sets in the middle of the chain.
Love the connection of the topic to sheep
- Really interesting destination and fittingly mind-boggling conclusion.
- The first two thirds of background were helpful and well paced. I think the pivot towards the ‘grand finale’ could have been a little more explicit, or perhaps structurally some of the background material could have been omitted to get to the finale earlier.
- Trivial: Use ` (back tick) in LaTeX to get a left quote
Cute animations, good explainations, but the pace was too slow for me. I feel like you spent a bit too much time on things that most viewers will understand in a few sentences. For a big part of the video I was just waiting for what’s next. Still, I think your ideas, presentation style and knowledge are a great starting point for a good educator. If you increase the pace and trim a bit more thoroughly, I think your videos will be very good!