Overtone Scales on Stage - Simple Math for Surprising Musical Harmony
The video presents the math needed to expand “Tonal Space”, where a well-defined, extended set of musical intervals resides. Numerous “Rational Intervals” and “Spectral Chords” are illustrated with Manim animations and audio examples.
Intervals and chords are the building blocks of musical harmony. They constitute tonality within a piece of music. If harmony is to be evolved, supplementary chords must be identified and appropriate strategies for playing have to be developed. Thus, the musical chord becomes our central entity for further research.
Assuming that some “extended harmony” exists outside of our familiar cadences, the video illustrates how to identify attractive complementary chords and how to integrate them into a musical instrument for live performance.
While countless timbres have been created since the early days of electronic sound design, keyboard instruments with *dynamic intonation control* have not gained much popularity on the stages of the world (with the exception of MIDI pitchbend, which affects all ringing notes by the same interval). Perhaps one reason is that more than twelve pitches per octave appear difficult to handle in a live situation. Maybe the benefits of enriched harmony have not been successfully communicated to composers and to performing musicians.
Therefore, the second part of the video deals with the concept of a real instrument with enhanced intonation capabilities, designed to …
• minimize dissonance and beating in polyphonic music
• render an extended set of consonant musical chords
• freely modulate through 12 chromatic keys
• implement innovative strategies for changing the pitch of multiple notes (individually and simultaneously) over a wide range - continuously or in discrete steps
• maintain the best possible compatibility with twelve tone equal temperament (12tet)
• be suitable for live performance
A piano keyboard (that can simultaneously address up to twelve pitches per octave) is a good starting point for explaining a process we call “dynamic pitch mapping”, which describes the assignment of a given “sequence of intervals” to successive keys at performance time.
For best tonal compatibility with instruments tuned in 12tet, the twelve equally tempered pitches per octave (forming a stack of “irrational intervals”) are an integral part of the instrument's design. It's up to the player to assign one (at a time) of the 12tet-pitches to the appropriate key during live performance. While such an assignment slightly retunes all pitches, the actual intervals between the keys remain unaffected.
The subject of this video is at the intersection of art, math and engineering. It would be awesome to take the ideas that have been prototyped so far and turn them into an instrument available to anyone interested.
*Video Chapters*
00:00 Introduction
00:50 Should I watch?
02:25 Frequency Ratio and Musical Interval
03:39 Expanding a Plane of Tonal Space
05:16 Definition of Terms
07:02 Triads in Tonal Space
09:10 3D-Tonal Space
09:45 Balance - A Property of Spectral Chords
10:22 Added Notes and Extended Chords
11:38 Hyperbolic Stretching of Intervals
12:09 Hyperbolic Stretching of Chords
13:08 A Real Musical Instrument
14:58 Dynamic Mapping of Intervals
17:57 Musical Score
18:28 Proof of Concept
19:28 Polar Art
20:30 Intermediary Chords in Standard Chord Progressions
21:43 Coda (until 22:36)
*Acknowledgements*
Two decades ago, I was lucky enough to find Tim Thompson's “Keykit” on the Internet, a programming environment for experimental real-time processing and creation of MIDI messages. The Keykit language features an ingenious generic “phrase” data type, that stores a tempo-related sequence of MIDI events. The software of the instrument described here was written entirely in Keykit. Keykit is still available on GitHub.
Stephan Schmitt, co-founder of Native Instruments and director of Nonlinear Labs in Berlin encouraged me to put my ideas on paper and produce the first sound examples. Stephan is a brilliant motivator.
Grant Sanderson's Manim library was a major inspiration for the dynamic visualization of tonal relationships.
In a last-minute move, Joachim Schmidt, Hamburg, mastered the audio track of the video.
Thanks to all of you, to the 3b1b team and of course to the Manim CE community!
*Resources*
Sethares, William A. Tuning Timbre Spectrum Scale. London: Springer Verlag, 1999.
Helmholtz, Hermann. On the Sensations of Tone. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1954.
Eskelin, Gerald. Lies my music teacher told me. Woodland Hills CA, USA: Stage 3 Publishing, 1997
Numerous contributors of royalty-free photography and audio at pixabay.com – thank you so much for sharing your art.
This video was created by Holger Stoltenberg (Hamburg, DE) for the community-based Summer of Math Exposition (SoMEpi), 2024. You can contact the author at [email protected]
Analytics
Comments
3.1
Hi ! I appreciate the amount of work you put into the video, and the topic is very interesting. I hope you will continue making videos, the intersection of math and music theory is very good. We can both hear and see things, which is incredible.
However there are a few major issue that you can improve upon for the lesson to be easier to follow:
- first thing is the pace, in the beginning of the video you quickly go over some key definitions that are used in all the following explanations. You should definitely spend more time on these elements. Later in the video, your pace is considerably slower, but the attention is already lost.
- the other main issue is with your visualisations: they are overcrowded, which makes them very difficult to read. For instance many times you have two sets of numbers on the x-axis. You should definitely explain what we see in more details the first few times.
- another related issue is the excessive amount of text in some parts of the video (see 6:01, 9:45 or 14:21) for instance. It is exactly the same rule as for slide shows: when viewers are presented with text, they have less attention available for listening to you. When you talk, the viewer has less attention for reading. Overall it confuses the viewer more than anything if you talk on top of a lot of text.
- Finally, I know a nice audio setup is not available for everyone, I don't have one myself, but there are tools freely available to improve the audio quality of your video. The sound quality makes the video hard to follow, especially when you talk. When other sounds are played the quality is noticably better.
Hope all these feedbacks will help you improve, and thanks for submitting the video !
6.1
Sadly, I don't understand music. So I can't vote on comprehension, but how the topic was introduced. I believe that the math is great to some, but I just can't evaluate that. What I want to point out is the interesting use of Manim, but I'd suggest commenting during the Manim graphs/animations. Looking at the video I almost felt I was looking at a weird mix between a documentary and a PowerPoint. Going of the tips for doing a great PowerPoint. Try to avoid creating huge wall of texts during some scenes and avoid saying word for word what is on the screen. I'm not saying you can't use MathTex objects in Manim, but consider the use of text and the information it should provide without jeopardize the info given by the voiceover.
Overall I'd find this video better than usual math videos if those changes were implemented. Either way, good job.
5.4
This was a fever dream. There are way to many terms, vaguely defined concepts and honestly too many formulas.
I am in som narrow technical sense a professional classical musician and theoretical physicist, and I don’t think all of this makes sense, but I enjoyed it
3.1
This video relies implicitly on a lot of music theory knowledge. For an audience that doesn't have that background, this is really hard to follow.
A good structure to use is to start with an introduction where you explain the basics (even simple things like what a chord is), to build up from there (using only those basic concepts) to the thing you want the audience to appreciate, then to recap the key takeaways.
5.3
Goal Orientation: 4/10
Novelty: 8/10
Thought-Provoking: 2/10
Comprehensibility: 2/10
Technological: 6/10
Overall Average: 4.4/10
3.2
Interesting topic, but rather hard to follow.
3
On many slides amount of information much more than expla